Press Releases

October 20  2009 October 13  2009 August 05  2009 August 04  2009 August 03  2009 June 02  2009 June 02  2009 April 28  2009 December 23  2008 September 04  2008 May 20  2008 April 30  2008 January 29  2008 January 24  2008 January 08  2008 December 05  2007 November 21  2007 October 17  2007 October 16  2007 September 07  2007 August 17  2007 August 13  2007 July 02  2007 June 28  2007 May 21  2007 May 18  2007 April 24  2007 March 13  2007 March 02  2007 February 13  2007 January 26  2007 January 25  2007 January 05  2007 January 03  2007 December 01  2006 September 12  2006 August 21  2006 July 31  2006 June 12  2006 June 05  2006 April 10  2006 March 09  2006 March 02  2006 March 02  2006 December 27  2005 December 05  2005 December 01  2005 November 16  2005 September 22  2005 September 19  2005 August 31  2005 August 25  2005 August 02  2005 June 30  2005 June 17  2005 March 07  2005 February 15  2005 January 18  2005

Coal-bed methane discharge water threaten to strangle the flow of untreated water into ephemeral drainages

February 13  2007

By BRANTLEY HARGROVE

News-Record Writer

bhargrove@gillettenewsrecord.net

As upcoming rulings on coal-bed methane discharge water threaten to strangle the flow of untreated water into ephemeral drainages, treatment is looking better all the time.

 

 

Now, about 60 percent of produced water is dumped down drainages. A little more than 1 percent is treated — that figure may soon change.

The Environmental Quality Council in a week will consider a proposed rule that could more effectively protect agricultural uses of coal-bed water. They  will also preside over another rulemaking down the road that may more stringently protect landowners from coal-bed water that is a nuisance, can cause injury or promote some kind of pollution.

It’s not a problem that’s going to evaporate anytime soon.

As a general rule, the average well produces around 2 barrels of water per million cubic feet of gas. That figure will only rise as the water-laden seams of the Big George in Johnson County are tapped.

 

 

Even so, gas operators have been reluctant to wade into water treatment.

Historically, it’s been seen as something of a caustic that dissolves profits.

The treatment process itself has endured a few fits and starts:

The most notable is Anadarko Petroleum Co.’s mineral zeolite treatment that was relegated to the scrap heap, along with mounds of zeolite.

Reverse osmosis has made some showing, but according to those in industry, it’s prohibitively expensive and can’t handle the saltier waters of the northern and western Powder